Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media, as well as to allow video information to be shared for both marketing, analytics and editorial purposes.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content
BMC is moving to Springer Nature Link. Visit this journal in its new home.
Fig. 1 | Animal Microbiome

Fig. 1

From: Metagenomic comparison of the faecal and environmental resistome on Irish commercial pig farms with and without zinc oxide and antimicrobial usage

Fig. 1

Relative abundance of antimicrobial, heavy metal, and biocide resistance classes, with A showing the resistome composition of each sample on each farm and B comparison of treatment types [AB-ZnO (darker colours; indicated by dark grey in legend) and AB-ZnO free farms (lighter colours; indicated by light grey in legend)] per sample. Treatment types were compared per sample type using the Mann–Whitney U test with α = 0.05. Significant differences are indicated in red by an asterisk (p < 0.05). SFD, swab samples of cleaned feeders and drinkers of empty cleaned pens; SWF, swab sample of walls and floor of the pens prior to introduction of weaned piglets; FW0, faecal samples at the day of weaning; FW1, faecal samples 1 week post-weaning; FW2, faecal samples 2 weeks post-weaning

Back to article page

Animal Microbiome

ISSN: 2524-4671